Hilary Devey's Women at the Top is
particularly enlightening given the recent EU discussions and consequential debates about mandatory quotas for women on boards.
Europe's listed companies will be forced to reserve at least 40% of their non-executive director board seats for women by 2020 or face fines and other sanctions under a proposal being drafted by the European Commission. Some businesses do not agree that it will help matters as each business is different and often they prefer to exercise their own diversity policies in recruitment, believing there are other ways to achieve diversity. The second episode looks at this quota system as exercised in Norway.
Europe's listed companies will be forced to reserve at least 40% of their non-executive director board seats for women by 2020 or face fines and other sanctions under a proposal being drafted by the European Commission. Some businesses do not agree that it will help matters as each business is different and often they prefer to exercise their own diversity policies in recruitment, believing there are other ways to achieve diversity. The second episode looks at this quota system as exercised in Norway.
I
loved the first episode of Women at the Top (you have 5 days left to watch)! One key thing stuck out for me: it was proved that gender-mixed teams are more
productive. This was shown in a couple of businesses' financial figures,
but also in an exercise where three groups of people were asked to build a
paper tower under a time limit with limited resources.
The first, all-male, group were all competing to be
team leader and to come up with the chosen idea. It was a bit tense and
serious. Their tower was not structurally sound and collapsed.
The all-female team were all trying to
take account of one another's ideas (or at least attempting to show
that they were), yet there was a few moments where a quieter team member (with
a great idea) had to weigh up her aims for this task: did she want to speak
over the lady who's idea was being accepted and risk being rejected by the
group, or go along with the other lady’s idea and remain accepted as 'one of
the team'? The result of the chosen idea was a tower that was too short.
The group comprising 50% men and 50% women had an
entirely different atmosphere about them from the off- they were smiling
(almost flirtatious at times), relaxed and all felt comfortable to put forward
their ideas, justifying them whilst listening to others, without the pressure
of trying to ensure their own idea shone through nor trying to be seen as a
leader. The gender-diverse team held a clear win with a tall and sturdy tower.
Obviously
this was one experiment with a small selection of people; however, with the
backing of financial statistics, the benefits of mixed gender teams are
obvious. I also thought this experiment represented an interesting insight into
how same-gender and mixed-gender groups operate from a business psychology
perspective.
In another exercise, groups of male and female
students in blue and red t-shirts provided a striking visual representation of the number of women and men at each hierarchical level in
UK business. I probably do not need to add that it was really quite shocking
how few women reach senior level and particularly executive board level after
graduating, despite having the same qualifications as their male counterparts.
Even
though this topic is not new, it is being brought to light in the mass media
thanks to this programme. I think this is possibly the first time that the
opportunities and challenges of women in business has caught the
attention of those outside the realm of governance or HR in this way. If it
helps people (male and female) at all levels of business become more aware of
the situation, then we are beginning to create a culture of change, with or
without official quotas.
